|
Dairyman's
State Bank
From: Nancy Carli
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 9:28 AM
To: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov; Comments; regs.comments@occ.treas.gov;
regs.comments@ots.treas.gov
Subject: EGRPRA-Privacy of Consumer Financial Information/Safegaurding Customer
Information
I believe both
of the subjects listed are included in Information Security, which
has become an extremely cumbersome area. We are a small bank, under
$100 million. We do not share customer information. Period. But with
regulators wanting us to document how we don’t give out customer
information, perform annual (or more frequent) risk assessments showing
how we don’t give out customer information, testing our procedures
to prove we don’t give out customer information, developing
written policies stating that we don’t give out customer information,
and repeatedly training our already well seasoned staff not to give
out customer information is getting burdensome, time consuming, and
redundant.
I believe that, since we do not share information in any way that a customer
could opt out of, we should be able to give the customer a notice when we open
an account telling them our privacy policy and not have to continually send
annual notices. I believe those are a waste of time and money; most customers
just toss them in the garbage without even reading them, since they get so
many from their other institutions.
I believe we should have a privacy program, an information security program,
OR a risk assessment; not all three. Information security and risk are already
covered by a number of other bank policies like its Information Technology
Policy, Security Policy, Disaster Recovery, etc. However, examiners are insisting
that we reiterate the bank’s practices in yet another policy/program.
Our employees are informed that they must adhere to bank policies or they could
be penalized or fired. I feel that additional testing is not worth the time.
I know these measures have come about to attempt to address identity theft,
but I don’t think this will prevent it from happening. I can test all
of my employees today, and they will do their jobs correctly and protect the
customer’s privacy, then tomorrow they could get a call and let slip
some information. We may never give out a customer’s information, but
when the customer does, and they become victims of identity theft, it somehow
becomes our fault.
Each of my staff attends several training seminars outside of the bank each
year. Each of these seminars, regardless of topic, addresses customer information
privacy. I discuss with each of my departments the need for customer privacy
during the year. I feel that the requirement of annual training besides all
this other information is too much.
Nancy Carli
Compliance Officer
Dairyman's State Bank
135 S. Main St.
Clintonville, WI 54929
|