EGRPRA


EGRPRA Home
What Are We Doing
Top Ten Issues
Read Comments
Site Map
Search EGRPRA

blue image
Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act with EGRPRA logo on left side

Comment

 


From: Dale Torpey [mailto:dtorpey@federationbankia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 1:02 PM
To: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov; Comments; regs.comments@occ.treas.gov; regs.comments@ots.treas.gov
Subject: EGRPRA

I would like to comment on Reducing Regulatory Burden.

Specifically under the BSA requirements.
Suspicious Activity Reports are required to be filed for a variety of reasons.
Over the last couple of years we have filed several SARs. We have received some of them back because of incomplete information.
It is very time consuming to file these forms.
What is inconsistent about them is that the FBI has only investigated one SAR and after a short investigation it was ruled not worth their effort.
There seems to be a level of loss to the Bank where the FBI will investigate. That level seems to be $100,000.00.
I would suggest that the FDIC coordinate with the FBI to determine how they look at the SARs and then rewrite the regulation to fit what is being investigated.
A lot of time is wasted by bank employees, the processing center in Detroit and the FBI.

Yours truly,
Dale J. Torpey
President & CEO
Federation Bank
Washington, Iowa


 
menu item:About EGRPRA, sub menus under About EGRPRA Are: What is EGRPRA? Why Is EGRPRA Important? Why Should Bankers and Consumers Comment? The Law menu item:Comments and recommendations, sub menus under Comments and recommendations Are: Submit Comments & Recommendations Read Comments & Recommendations menu Item: Communications, sub menus under Communicatons Are: What We Are Doing To Reduce Burden Banker's Top Ten Issues - 2003 Press Releases Comments, Quotes and news Federal Register Notices menu item Outreach events, sub menus under Outreach events are: 2003 - 2004 Map menu item:About Agencies, sub menus under Agencies Are: FFIEC FDIC FRB OCC OTS NCUA