|
North Carolina Bankers Association
April 20,
2005
Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency Ms. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary
250 E Street,
SW Board of
Governors of the Federal
Public Information Room
Reserve System
Mailstop
1-5 20th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC
20219 Washington, DC
20551
Robert E. Feldman, Executive
Secretary Regulation Comments
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chief
Counsel’s Office
550 17th Street, NW
Office of Thrift Supervision
Washington, DC 20429
1700 G Street, NW
Washington, DC 20552
Re: Request for Burden
Reduction Recommendations
Ladies and Gentlemen:
In February, the OCC, Federal
Reserve, FDIC, and OTS (the Agencies) asked for
recommendations on how to reduce the burden of rules
pertaining to Money Laundering, Safety and Soundness,
and Securities. The North Carolina Bankers Association
(NCBA) is pleased to have the opportunity to comment on
these issues.
The NCBA is a trade association
representing all 139 banks, savings institutions, and
trust companies headquartered or doing business in North
Carolina. On behalf of our members, we ask the Agencies
to consider implementing changes in the following areas.
CURRENCY TRANSACTION REPORTS
Our first recommendation relates to
Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs). We recommend that
the threshold for filing CTRs be modified. The current
threshold of $10,000 has not been adjusted for inflation
and is too low to be truly beneficial. We propose
increasing the threshold to at least $25,000.
As a related issue, we propose
modifying the definition of exempt persons. Currently,
a customer can qualify for exempt status by maintaining
an account for at least 12 months and meeting additional
requirements. As other commentators have stated, this
waiting period should be substantially shorter. CTRs
lose their effectiveness when they are being filed
needlessly, as may occur when an established business
moves an account between banks.
Similarly, we ask you to consider
eliminating the biennial filing requirement with respect
to certain exempt persons. Banks are already required
to provide information annually supporting the
designation of exempt persons. It seems unnecessary to
require more frequent filings for certain customers.
SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS
Another one of our recommendations
relates to the filing of Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs).
We are concerned that the steadily increasing volume of
SARs is degrading their effectiveness. We request that
the Agencies work with FinCEN to provide detailed
guidance on when SARs should be filed and what
documentation should be retained by banks. Until
further clarity is achieved in this area, banks will
continue to file SARs in record numbers so as to protect
themselves from the severe penalties of potential
noncompliance.
ANNUAL AUDITS
A final area of concern is the
interplay between the annual independent audit and
reporting rules enacted under the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA) and those
enacted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Many
banks are subject to both sets of rules. To the extent
possible, we ask the FDIC and the other Agencies to work
in cooperation with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission to explore ways of streamlining the audit and
attestation process.
The North Carolina Bankers
Association appreciates the opportunity to submit these
comments. If you have any questions, then please
contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
Nathan R. Batts
Associate Counsel
|