EGRPRA


EGRPRA Home
What Are We Doing
Top Ten Issues
Read Comments
Site Map
Search EGRPRA

blue image
Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act with EGRPRA logo on left side

Comment

 


F rom: Reta Davis [mailto:davisr@bakerboyer.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 11:43 AM
To: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov; Comments; regs.comments@occ.treas.gov; regs.comments@ots.treas.gov
Subject: EGRPRA

 

1.The Anti-Money laundering rules are necessary but the level of documentation required is overly burdensome. In our last OCC exam we were advised to keep a binder of records on SAR Suspects – No Report filed. This I guess was to show we are alert. The rules of when to file a SAR, and common sense should be enough. It seems silly to have to keep a file on all the situations we check out that do not have enough merit to file a SAR.

2. The registration requirements of MSB’s has merit. The documentation we are required to keep on small accounts that occasionally cash checks totaling $1000.00 is very time consuming. I think the rules should be changed to read “if the business cashed checks totaling over $1000.00 as a standard practice of their business:.

Reta Davis
X225



 
menu item:About EGRPRA, sub menus under About EGRPRA Are: What is EGRPRA? Why Is EGRPRA Important? Why Should Bankers and Consumers Comment? The Law menu item:Comments and recommendations, sub menus under Comments and recommendations Are: Submit Comments & Recommendations Read Comments & Recommendations menu Item: Communications, sub menus under Communicatons Are: What We Are Doing To Reduce Burden Banker's Top Ten Issues - 2003 Press Releases Comments, Quotes and news Federal Register Notices menu item Outreach events, sub menus under Outreach events are: 2003 - 2004 Map menu item:About Agencies, sub menus under Agencies Are: FFIEC FDIC FRB OCC OTS NCUA