From: SNB [mailto:snbank@ruraltel.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 12:54 PM
To: regs.comments@federalreserve.gov; Comments; regs.comments@occ.treas.gov;
regs.comments@ots.treas.gov
Subject: EGRPRA
The BSA/AML burden was the straw that broke the camel's
back for me. Those regulations, along with
others, have caused me to decide to take early retirement
from banking. I have agreed to stay for awhile
longer to train replacements for my duties but will
be retiring about 3 years before I otherwise would
have.
The recent complexities, added to banking's already
burdensome regulations, are creating tensions among
our employees, between compliance officers and
employees, and between regulators and bank employees. I
have not seen anything like it in all my years of banking. The
regulations are now so complex and numerous that we
cannot get the same story from the various agencies,
from one regulatory person to another, or even from
the same person from day to day. The exact details
of what we must do is in a constant state of flux,
a pot constantly stirred up by politicians and bureaucrats.
Even though the countless regulations place great strains
on our workforce, my primary reason for leaving is
philosophical. Many of our banking laws (and
other laws also) conflict with the principles of liberty
and the Constitution. The reasons used by our
judges in upholding these laws would get many of them
a failing grade in a college course in Logic. That
aside, Congress has passed these law which I don't
believe reflects well on its member's understanding
of the principles of liberty. I simply can no
longer tolerate participating in the enforcement of
laws I feel violate my liberties.
Congress has turned banks into an instrument of its
growing authoritarianism. As one example, Congress
now defines certain profession and activities as "high
risk" without those individuals being charged
or convicted on anything. These include lawyers,
car dealerships, auctioneers, accountants, and businesses
that cash payrollchecks for customers. We are
required to monitor their accounts and report anything
suspicious to the federal government (no search warrant
required). I have been a long-time student of
liberty and have always considered spying, snitching,
and the use of informants to monitor innocent citizens
to be characteristic of Nazis, communists, and other
types of tyrannical governments. Fifteen years
ago I would have never believed that my own government
would be requiring me to do the same thing to my neighbors
and friends. I experience a great deal of guilt
in performing these duties in addition to feeling like
a traitor to the principles of liberty.
I fear what is happening to our country. We are
sacrificing our liberties left and right for "security." Congress
says that these laws are to protect us from terrorists
(There are always "justifications" for sacrificing
our liberties.). With all the intrusive legislation
that has been passed over the last 70 years and statements
from government officials like that of Gen. Patrick
M. Hughes ("We have to abridge individual rights;
change the societal conditions, and act in ways that
heretofore were not in accordance with our values and
traditions..."), I now fear our federal government
far more than I do any terrorist.
Regarding terrorism, I think we need a truly independent
study of our federal government's activities relative
to foreign countries and peoples to really understand
what is happening in the world. Yes, there are
terrorists, but terrorists do not exist without
reason. No one becomes a terrorist for simply
ideological reaons. Something is causing the
tension that creates terrorism and I suspect a primary
culprit is our federal government, and more specifically,
the state department. Considering the arrogance
with which our federal government deals with its own
citizens, I cannot imagine how it deals with foreign
peoples where it does not have suspicious citizens
looking over its shoulder.
To paraphrase Walter Williams, although we are not
now a tyrannical societ6y, there can be no doubt about
which direction we are headed a step at a time with
each new piece of legislation. Each new law strips
away something we could have decided for ourselves,
a little piece of our liberty.
A very concerned citizen,
John A. Berkley
President
The Stockton National Bank
Stockton, Kansas 67669
|