Need for statutory change.
Do the statutes impose unnecessary requirements? Are any of the
statutory requirements underlying these categories imposing
redundant, conflicting or otherwise unduly burdensome regulatory
requirements?
Need and purpose of the regulations.
Do the regulations in these categories fulfill current needs?
Has industry or other circumstances changed since a regulation
was written such that the regulation is no longer necessary?
Have there been shifts within the industry or consumer actions
that suggest a re-focus of the underlying regulations? Do any
of the regulations in these categories impose burdens not
required by their authorizing statutes?
Overarching approaches / flexibility of the regulatory standards.
Generally, is there a different approach to regulating that the
Agencies could use that would achieve statutory goals while
imposing less burden? Do any of the regulations in these
categories or the statutes underlying them impose unnecessarily
inflexible requirements?
Effect of the regulations on competition.
Do any of the regulations in these categories or the statutes
underlying them create competitive disadvantages for one part of
the financial services industry compared to another?
Reporting, recordkeeping and disclosure requirements.
Do any of the regulations in these categories or the statutes
underlying them impose particularly burdensome reporting,
recordkeeping or disclosure requirements? Are any of these
requirements similar enough in purpose and use so that they
could be consolidated? Which, if any, of these requirements
could be fulfilled electronically to reduce their burden?
Consistency and redundancy.
Do any of the regulations in these categories or the underlying
statutes impose inconsistent or redundant regulatory
requirements that are not warranted by the circumstances?
Clarity.
Are the regulations in these categories and the underlying
statutes drafted in clear and easily understood language? Are
there specific regulations or underlying statutes that need
clarification?
Burden on small insured institutions.
The Agencies have a particular interest in minimizing burden on
small insured institutions (those with assets of $150 million or
less). The Agencies solicit comment on whether any regulations
within these categories should be continued without change, or
amended or rescinded in order to minimize any significant
economic impact the regulations may have on a substantial number
of small insured institutions.
menu item:About EGRPRA, sub menus under About EGRPRA Are:
What is EGRPRA?
Why Is EGRPRA Important?
Why Should Bankers and Consumers Comment?
The Law
menu item:Comments and recommendations, sub menus under Comments and recommendations Are:
Submit Comments & Recommendations
Read Comments & Recommendations
menu Item: Communications, sub menus under Communicatons Are:
What We Are Doing To Reduce Burden
Banker's Top Ten Issues - 2003
Press Releases
Comments, Quotes and news
Federal Register Notices
menu item Outreach events, sub menus under Outreach events are:
2003 - 2004 Map
menu item:About Agencies, sub menus under Agencies Are:
FFIEC
FDIC
FRB
OCC
OTS
NCUA